The University of Chicago Undergraduate Law Review (UCULR) is a student-run publication dedicated to the discussion, analysis, interpretation, and evaluation of a variety of legal issues. It aims to provide a better understanding of the law in all of its ambiguities and contradictions in order to reveal how complex compilations of regulatory components can not only serve as reflections of social attitudes towards general ideas of order, agency, consent, power, and choice, but influence the most minute details of everyday life.
FEATURED BLOG POST
Abstract: The International Court of Justice is charged with serving the bodies of the United Nations along with its member-states. Its authority and objectivity has been questioned on numerous occasions. The Statute of the International Court of Justice, included in the United Nations Charter, does not require all states to recognize the jurisdiction of the Court, leading the majority of UN members to reject its power. With the Security Council charged with executing its decisions but only one permanent member recognizing its authority, there is a conflict of interest. The judge selection process has received much criticism as the Security Council elects the judges, creating a process that is open to political influence. Some argue that the practice of introducing ad hoc judges that represent each party in a case disrupts the impartiality of the Court while others claim it serves to strengthen it. This essay examines the Court’s lack of authority and, perhaps, impartiality as well.
Author: Shree Mehrotra is currently a second-year in the College pursuing a major in Environmental Science.
FEATURED BLOG POST
Abstract: Legislative paradox surrounds tigers and their private owners in the United States. While Tigers are protected under the Endangered Species Act they are sold in many states for as little as $400 dollars and raised as family pets. Their ownership is so prevalent that it is estimated that there are more tigers in the United States than in their native habitat. Numerous federal, state, and local laws attempt to protect humans from tigers and tigers from humans. Tigers, despite their protected status, continue to be worth more dead than alive. Can protective legislation be enforced despite biological loopholes? A mass exotic animal escape, a tiger living in an apartment, and yet another living at a truck stop served as recent impetuses for laws regulating exotic animal ownership. Could such laws better public safety while respecting the rights of tiger owners?
Author: Sebastien Akarmann is currently a senior at the University of Chicago, pursuing a major in History.